Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Film & TV on DVD - John Doe News & Reviews

 
Greetings Film Fiends and welcome to John Doe's Film Blog. 30 years of dedicated celluloid obsession has meant that I have seen a few films. Drawing attention to some of the lesser discussed gems that I love. Cult classics, obscure curios and quality genre pictures. This blogs purpose is to translate some of my passion for these films and with luck, inspire you the reader to go check em out.
The Nature of the Beast, The Beauty of the Innocent


Sling Blade DVD
The U.S Director's Cut - Unavailble in Australia
Writer/Director: Billy Bob Thornton
Starring: Billy Bob Thornton, Lucas Black, Robert Duvall, Dwight Yokam, J.T Walsh, John Ritter,


“Some folks call it a sling blade, I call it a kaiser blade.”Karl Childers

To try and distil the essence of Billy Bob Thornton’s directorial opus Sling Blade is to address the full myriad of humanities emotions, frailties and strengths. It is a film that challenges with intensity while simultaneously leaving you in awe of its beauty.

At its core it’s a tale of redemption and sacrifice, friendship and love. Delicate yet volatile, complex and tender this is a drama of such passionate telling that it helps you understand the very nature of mankind.
“I learned to read some. I read the Bible quite a bit. I can't understand all of it, but I reckon I understand a good deal of it. Them stories you and Mama told me ain't in there. You ought not done that to your boy. I studied on killing you. Studied on it quite a bit. But I reckon there ain't no need for it if all you're gonna do is sit there in that chair. You'll be dead soon enough and the world 'll be shut of ya. You ought not killed my little brother, he should've had a chance to grow up. He woulda had fun some time.”Karl Childers

The story begins down South in a mental institution where a psychologically stinted, simple man named Karl Childers (Billy Bob Thornton) has been committed since 12 years old. Mentally handicapped he is a quiet outcast who many years ago misinterpreted sex as violence and in an act of unimaginable violence murdered his mother and her lover.
“I don't reckon I got no reason to kill nobody. Mmm.”Karl Childers

A grown man now released back into society with a handicap, he returns to his hometown despite his disconnection with the outside world. Mechanically gifted and unassuming Karl gets a job in a garage fixing engines and soon befriends Frank Wheatley an innocent 12 year old boy without prejudice.
“I don't think anything bad ought to happen to children. I think the bad stuff should be saved up for the people whose grown up. That's the way I see it.”Karl Childers

In many ways Karl is still a child himself and as this purest of friendships develops with Frank many things he doesn’t understand form the catalyst of impending disaster and retribution.
“Hey is this the kind of retard that drools and rubs shit in his hair and all that, 'cause I'm gonna have a hard time eatin' 'round that kind of thing now. Just like I am with antique furniture and midgets. You know that, I can't so much as drink a damn glass of water around a midget or a piece of antique furniture.” Doyle

sling blade billy bob thornton lucas black
I feel like some Fried taters mmm



John Doe says:
Remaking his own award winning 1994 short film “They Call It a Sling Blade”, Billy Bob Thornton delivers a film of startling, almost unbearable power and originality. Technically astonishing Sling Blade is drenched in a deep southern drawl of atmosphere and poetic pacing.

There is nothing simple in its execution, nor in the after effects of viewing. Morality and motivation are subjective. Humour permeates from the purity of situations and while never removing it’s cut throat razor sharpness and confronting honesty.

In lesser hands this could have easily been just another piece of schmaltzy cinema but the deft handling of this character driven story results in something truly unique and infinitely intriguing.

The cinematography seldom announces its splendour but often punctuates scenes. The musical score too lurks around frames, giving enough depth to confirm the intended mood.

Billy Bob’s screenplay unfolds with a deliberate, organic pace, that reflects the lead character ambling walk through life. Bold, intuitive dialogue at pivotal times keeping the viewer aware of the subtle yet clear intent.

As far as acting goes you won’t find many better in the last 25 years. Intensely focused, Billy Bob Thornton’s (Bad Santa, The Man Who Wasn’t There, One False Move) distorted facial movements, astonishing body language and brave accent never falters. You soon forget that you are watching a recognisable Star, it’s easy to believe every moment of the handicapped Karl. To find testament of his dedication you need only observe that he placed broken glass in his shoes in order to sustain the disjointed swagger of his part.

Lucas Black (Jarhead) fresh from his dominant role in the under appreciated American Gothic series again brings a maturity to the part of Karl’s youthful companion that is seldom reached by a child actor.

The late great John Ritter (Three’s Company, Bad Santa) in an against type serious part is equally impressive as the small town homosexual who lives in a self conscious state. Country music sensation Dwight Yokam (The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada) of also lodges a pitch perfect turn playing an abusive, red neck slime.

It comes as no surprise that Robert Duvall (The Godfather, Assassination Tango, Badge 373) makes his small part as Karl’s close minded father a memorable one.

For John Doe this is as good as a movie can be, as they say, “you will laugh, you will cry and you will be profoundly moved”. Highlighting the Academy Awards disconnection from quality cinema. Personally he feels it should have won Best Picture, Best Director and Best Actor. It rightfully won for Adapted Screenplay and Billy Bob was nominated for his sublime performance, losing to Geoffrey Rush in Shine, admittedly a fine portrayal too. The biggest travesty is that Sling Blade is currently unavailable on DVD in Australia and JD had to purchase a copy from the U.S. A blessing in disguise the double disc special edition is a Directors Cut loaded with incisive extra features.


Billy Bob as Karl Childers tells the tale of his mothers murder with intensity
150
Vote
   


Husbands (1970) - Footage Included

April 2nd 2008 00:01
The films of John Cassavetes: Part 5

Review By JDM Guest Writer: Shaun Katz

john cassavetes Husbands
Meet the men of Husbands


Last week I wrote about ‘Faces’, Cassavetes first crowning achievement.. This week in the 5th part of my series on Cassavetes films I get to the film which simultaneously gives me the most amount of thrill and frustration, joy and irritation, as an experience in life itself does. ‘Husbands’ is a slow experience with some overwhelming moments, brilliant in some, disappointing in others. Now while I genuinely do believe that Husbands could have been the masterpiece that Faces was, I certainly don’t see it as an uneven film. Instead it was a film which was so close to Cassavetes own life and so painfully personal that it becomes the closest to the actual experience of living that I have ever seen. No other film I have watched has provided the surreal yet hyper-real experience of making me feel that I was right next to the characters themselves that inhibit this film.

Written and directed in 1970, the film starts Peter Falk (Columbo, Wings of Desire), Ben Gazzara (Anatomy of a Murder, The Big Lebowski) and John Cassavetes himself (The Dirty Dozen, The Killers) as three middle aged men who aren’t just having a midlife crisis but are having a down right ‘what-has-been-the-point-of-m y-entire-life meltdown’. Any film goer who is familiar with the acting of these three men won’t be surprised to hear that there is an overdose of sublime acting in this film, which was financed independently and distributed through Columbia.

The film refers to itself as ‘a comedy about life, death and freedom’. Husbands begins with three men, played by Gazzara, Falk and Cassavetes attending the funeral of their former fourth compadre. In the film these three middle aged men go off on an extended wake, consuming large amounts of alcohol, followed by even larger amounts of throwing up. In their time together they contemplate what has become of their lives, their marriages, their dreams and take a flight of irresponsibility as they abandon everything they have and go off to London for an extended bender of gambling, women, drinking and sports. Upon letting their inner boys run rampant and forgetting their lives they ultimately land up fleeing from London again as we see that the dissatisfaction they have won’t go away.
husbands john cassavetes ben gazzara
John cassavetes and Ben Gazzara in full flight or is that fight


The very source and point of ‘Husbands’ experience comes out of the death of John Cassavetes younger brother, Nicholas Cassavetes. In the cathartic experience of creating Husbands - Cassavetes resists the traditional tendency to obviously make any point through the editing process. While the film has traditional edits from person to person, that is however as far as it is prepared to go. We are left with the raw experience of these three men, as they attempt to figure out what they have done right and wrong, just where, why and how their lives fell into mediocrity and banality.

This results in a film that demands multiple viewings for you to patiently discover its riches and dig an obscures masterpiece out from the overflow of unprocessed rawness. This is what I find so admirable about this movie, call Cassavetes reckless but he refused to edit together a film which lightly washed over the experience of these characters, he sticks us right down in the mud with them as we struggle ourselves to perceive any objectivity over what is happening.

Husbands could possibly be the funniest film ever made about life and death, in fact the original edit was by all accounts hilarious, edited by the Tanner brothers who were masters of comedy editing. To paraphrase Cassavetes himself, “the edit of Husbands is wonderful, a really funny film that Columbia pictures are very pleased with and it’s a pity that no one will ever get to see it”. Cassavetes ripped Columbia’s edit away from them as it was his right to do, according to his contract, and re-edited a much tougher film to sit through. In return for his efforts Columbia pulled the film from the cinema as soon as it started turning out poor box office return (also there were many people walking out the film who repulsed by the 11 minute scene involving an unappetisingly realistic vomiting contest that these men have after a few days of binge drinking) and Columbia also refused to release the film on video until 1999 (which included a certain 11 minute scene mysteriously gone from the film).

Husbands is ultimately a very brave film which compromises the entertainment value of itself in search of the journey you land up having with three middle aged men who are figuratively lost at sea and enter full crisis mode.


Here is a clip from Husbands





74
Vote
   


Faces (1968) - Footage Included

March 27th 2008 00:05
John Cassavetes Faces
By JDM Guest writer: Shaun Katz

This is the fourth segment of weekly reviews on the films of John Cassavetes.

faces poster
Faces Poster


A few weeks ago I discussed how Shadows was Cassavetes first and only film to be made so far by him in an entirely independent way. Even though we got a taste in Shadows, Faces is the first film where the explosiveness of spontaneity, embarrassment, uncontrollable outbursts and expressive volatility came to an operatic peak. We get to live through these peoples lives in a way that has really never been emulated since.

john cassavetes faces
Two of the faces in Faces


Faces comes out of Cassavetes meditation on the most miserable period of his life, making studio films. Cassavetes found himself living his life as part of a culture of men who prided themselves on being bullies. The emptiness of these men’s lives extended to not only using money to stampede over whoever they could, but using money to conduct their most personal and romantic relations with women too. Cassavetes said he woke up one day and realized that he was living in this sub culture. People who made their lives about achievement only and the more unhappy they were the more they used their financial power and status to over-compensate.

If the main presence in Shadows was playfulness, then in Faces the main one is crisis. ‘Faces’ contains more laughter then I have seen in any other film, however, this is a laughter of complete denial, laughter of desperation, anxiety, hysterics, in fact every type of laughter except playfulness. Occasionally there will be laughter from characters that seem to come from playfulness, but it’s really coming from an utter fear of silence.

Now, contradictory to that, Faces is a surprisingly very funny film, a film where sleep walkers are slapped awake and forced to feel real emotions again, are caused to get in touch with everything that they think they don’t have anymore and everything that they stand to lose – in the case of these men, their marriages.

Here is a sample of the wit and humour in Faces


Near the beginning of the film we see three drunken adults, two of them middle aged men, acting like children. However, this is a far cry from Too Late Blues or Shadows, idealism has worn thin, sincerity has been fatigued, society and responsibility say that it is inappropriate for them to behave this way. It’s an embarrassing scene to watch as these two middle aged men become awfully catty, as they vie for the affection of a young prostitute they are spending the evening with. After one of these older men throw a tantrum that is the emotional equivalent of a ten year old, the party is broken up and the two men go home to their wives. Their wives being the other side of the coin. Cassavetes explores in a series of startling revelations these women and their feelings or in many cases their buried feeling concerning their husbands. Needless to say - affairs are rampant.

The film gains intensity when Richard Forst (played by John Marley) demands a divorce from his wife, Maria (Lynn Carlin, who was also nominated for an Oscar in the film, although talk of Oscar nominations in the context of this film is absolutely ludicrous). These two married people go out into a world where everything is exploding with change in the culture, the sexual revolution is occurring and the women in these marriages are stuck with the short end of the stick, in marriages with husbands they still love but have no idea how to express themselves. The men continue to chug along in the manner that they are used to, flashing their positions on the work chain as they see themselves being replaced by younger men with new ideals. Richard and Maria both search for a temporary fling that night to run away from the doom of their marriage and after one of the most powerful climaxes I have ever seen in any film, where the temperature goes beyond boiling, they still have to return to each other, figure out what they are doing and where they have gone wrong.

RICHARD FORST“Do you want violence! You want me to be violent, is that it? Do you want me to slap you across the face every time you open your mouth?!”

john cassavetes faces
The distorted Face of love


Something very interesting about Faces is that is seems to have been made in a way that consciously tries to avoid analysis. Everything about the way the film was made attempts to destroy everything we have traditionally looked at as cinematic shorthands for analysis eg. Expressive camera angles, mood music etc. The film demands that we take a more human approach to its experience. This will be the first Cassavetes film that feels like every element is stripped down to a rawness, where all we have are the people in them. Al Ruban’s high contrast, 16 mm, black and white cinematography helps achieve this as his camera zooms in a little too close to the actor and reveals all.

The biggest revelation in this film however is the acting, Faces set a new standard for spontaneity in film. The actor who steals the show in this department is Seymour Cassel (The Royal Tenenbaums, Convoy, The Last Tycoon, Dead Presidents etc.), who won the 1968 National Society of Film Critics award for best supporting actor and a 1969 Oscar nomination. Hands down, I believe this to be one of the greatest performances of all time as he plays ‘Chet’ a young, happy go lucky ladies man who has these house wives fighting over him as he attempts to make them lighten up a little. Gena Rowlands is also very strong in the film, although I think she does better work in Cassavetes later films.

A scene from the film with Seymour Cassel in full flight


The fact that so many critics thought that his films were improvised is only a credit to Cassavetes as a writer, what he is doing in terms of dramatic structure in this film is so fundamentally different to most films that it’s no surprise that the film is lost on many viewers. Faces is considered to possibly be the film that spawned the ground breaking American cinema of the seventies. It came out at a time when the studios where dying. Hollywood was continually losing money and while Robert Altman and Sydney Lumet were certainly pushing out regular films at that time, Faces is said to be the film that sparked and inspired the revolution of American films by Scorsese, Coppola, Hopper, Lucas and Friedkin and its mark can still be felt today in T.V. shows like ‘The Office’ and ‘The Sopranos’.

As you can tell, Faces is a film I have an extraordinary passion for and the making of it which took four years is even more extraordinary, it is one of the films that changed my life and it literally rewired my nervous system the first time I watched it. I will now conclude this review before all objectivity goes out the window. I will end by saying that if you are comfortable mainly with mainstream films Faces may very well confuse you a little, no wait, a lot, however, if you are a viewer who considers yourself to be open minded to different forms of cinema then you are in for a very powerful film about a culture of people who’s own wealth has absolutely swallowed them up and they have forgotten themselves in it.

Coming next week – the intensity of Faces tips over into the madness of ‘Husbands


Watch the Faces Trailer
64
Vote
   


John Cassavetes: Part 3
Review By: Shaun Katz


[ Click here to read more ]
73
Vote
   


The Fumes of Change


two lane blacktop DVD
DVD Available in Australia
Director: Monte Hellman
[ Click here to read more ]
44
Vote
   


Shadows (1959) - Trailer Included

March 13th 2008 00:02
John Cassavete's Shadows

A review by: Shaun Katz

[ Click here to read more ]
86
Vote
   


Whatever Happened To Baby Jane


Whatever Happened to Baby Jane DVD
DVD Available in Australia

[ Click here to read more ]
96
Vote
   


Juno (2008) - Trailer Included

February 13th 2008 00:01
Juno's Arc

Juno Poster
Juno Poster

[ Click here to read more ]
132
Vote
   


Hud (1963) - Footage Included

January 10th 2008 00:02
Desolate Male Ego

Hud DVD
DVD Available in Australia
Director:Martin Ritt
[ Click here to read more ]
97
Vote
   


Heat (1995) - Footage Included

January 2nd 2008 00:01
Explosive motivations in the mirror

heat DVD
Heat DVD Cover- Available in Australia
Writer/Director: Michael Mann
[ Click here to read more ]
76
Vote
   


Dog Day Afternoon DVD
2 Disc Special Edition available in Australia
Director:Sidney Lumet
Writer:Frank Pierson
Starring:Al Pacino, John Cazale, Charles Durning

[ Click here to read more ]
65
Vote
   


Fear, corruption and sex - Brando goes down South.

the Chase Poster
Poster for The Chase - Available on DVD in Australia

[ Click here to read more ]
62
Vote
   


At Close Range
At Close Range movie poster

Based upon the true story of Philadelphia’s Bruce Johnston Sr. and his sons, and his accomplices; together, they formed a crime family during the late 1970s, thieving and laundering, and, ultimately, murdering.
[ Click here to read more ]
64
Vote
   


Breaking The Waves (1996)

September 18th 2007 01:47
Breaking The Waves
I first saw Lars Von Trier’s Breaking The Waves by myself at the Wellington Film Festival in New Zealand after it was first released. It was the final film of the festival with a festival party scheduled directly after the screening. It was a full house in the Embassy cinema (around 800 people), and during the last fifteen or so minutes I was sobbing. So were the people to left and right of me. In fact I believe most of the audience was in tears.

Straight after the screening I staggered out into the foyer and ordered a straight whiskey from the bar, then wondered around in a daze. Someone asked if I was alright and I replied that I had just seen Breaking The Waves and was an emotional wreck. From memory I didn’t last long at the after party I was too fragile.
[ Click here to read more ]
93
Vote
   


JohnDoe's Blogs

0 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
0 Post(s)
75 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
1 Post(s)
Moderated by JohnDoe